Northrop Grumman bows out of tanker bid
Northrop Grumman Corp. is withdrawing from a contest to provide the U.S. Air Force with a new fleet of tankers,
leaving Boeing Co. primed to land the initial $35-billion contract that military officials hope to award by this
fall.
With Monday's announcement, California-based Northrop made good on previous threats that it would pull out of the competition unless the Pentagon revised elaborate rules that appeared to favor Boeing's smaller, 767-based tanker over the larger Airbus A330 that Northrop planned to bid.
"We continue to believe that Northrop Grumman's tanker represents the best value for the military and taxpayer -- a belief supported by the selection of the A330 tanker design over the Boeing design in the last five consecutive tanker competitions around the globe," said Wes Bush, Northrop's CEO and president. "Regrettably, this means that the U.S. Air Force will be operating a less capable tanker than many of our Allies in this vital mission area."
The tanker saga, which has played out for nearly a decade, is one of the longest and strangest contests overseen by the Pentagon and involves one of the largest jackpots in military history.
The latest twist positions Chicago-based Boeing to replace all 415 Eisenhower-era jets that serve as aerial gas stations for the Air Force, a series of contracts expected to total more than $100 billion, analysts said.
Airbus, meanwhile, won't move forward with plans to build a large factory in Mobile, Ala., to assemble tankers and
A330 freighters, said Guy Hicks, vice president for communications with EADS North America, Northrop's partner in the bid and the corporate parent to Airbus.
Boeing won the first iteration of the contest only to be stripped of its victory amid an ethics scandal, a result of inquiries led by Sen. John McCain that resulted in jail terms for two Boeing executives.
Northrop scored an upset victory in 2008, but those results were annulled after Boeing mounted an unprecedented challenge and the Government Accountability Office later determined the Air Force's evaluation of the bids had been marred by "significant errors."
The latest rules, unveiled by the Obama administration in September and finalized in February, evaluated the proposals based on price as well as 372 mandatory requirements that bidders must meet.
Scores would also take into account the life-time expenses of operating the aircraft, as well as the cost to retrofit Air Force runways and hangars to accommodate the new tankers, potentially penalizing Northrop since the larger A330 would burn more fuel and wouldn't fit into current parking spaces.
Northrop felt the Air Force's new scoring methodology did not give its jet credit for being able to haul more fuel and cargo, Bush said, "precluding us from any competitive opportunity."
Chicago Tribune


